Originally, a single wax seal was accepted as a seal by the courts, but in the 19th century, many jurisdictions had relaxed the definition of the inscription of a print in the paper on which the instrument was printed, a paper moulding attached to an instrument, a scroll with a pencil or the words “Seal” or “L.S.” (the Latin term locus sigilli meaning “place of seal”). Historically, seals have been affixed to written contracts in order to rehabilitate the parties` intention to be legally bound to the terms and conditions contained in them. Originally, the dishes required that these seals be made from wax. However, over time, the formality of this requirement has loosened and the courts have begun to accept alternative means of “sealing” a written instrument, including the waterproofing of paper. Today, these jurisdictions, which recognize sealed documents, only have to include the word “SEAL” in the signature line. The reasons for this particular treatment of sealed contracts can be included in the legal formalities related to the waterproofing of a document with a wax seal. First, the legal formality of putting a seal on a document was evidence of a contract. Second, the need to use a label – widely recognized as legally important – has helped to give the parties the importance of the agreement. This element of consultation is important in the context of many legal theories, why pledges are generally not enforceable in the same way as contracts: there is a concern that pledges may sometimes be made under pressure (for example. B family members) without proper advice, which is why a requirement of the legal formality of the seal could replace a reflection to make charitable pledges enforceable. Third, the use of a label clearly demonstrated that the parties intended to proceed with a transaction.
 In Pennsylvania, the rule is: “If a party signs a contract containing a preprinted word “SEAL”, it is likely that that party signed a contract under the seal.” Beneficial Consumer Discount v. Dailey, 644 A.2d 789 (Pa. That`s great. 1994) (referring to Klein v. Reid, 422 A.2d 1143 (Pa. That`s great. Although this assumption is rebuttable, it is extremely difficult when the word “SEAL” appears next to a person`s signature. “Unless sufficiently refuted, the presence of the manufacturer`s signature, next to the word “seal” on a printed note, is sufficient evidence that the manufacturer did accept the seal.” Small, 422 A.2d to 1143. The delivery is made either by effective surrender to the other party or by the intention that the deed will be effective even if it is held by the party party. It is the only formal contract because it infers its validity from the form in which it is expressed and not because of the agreement or consideration. Nor do the contracts concluded resemble ordinary contracts.
A contract under the seal is a written promise or a series of promises that flow from it from the form and form of the performance instrument. The only preconditions are that the act be intentional and signed, sealed and delivered. The contract under the seal definition describes the contract as a contract that is “formal” and does not require consideration.3 min Read In addition to the imposition of the counterparty, other consequences of the label, which have been held, at least from a historical point of view, are: Although the inclusion of the word “SEAL” may be the most important feature of a sealed document , there are other factors that a court has raised in the decision as to whether a contract was signed under the seal. If you are unsure if an agreement you have been involved in falls within this definition, contact a qualified lawyer to help you make your decisions.